The "gag law"
In short, I agree that it is in violation of the Charter and should be abolished as soon as possible by parliament.
Non withstanding, it is presently law. As such, I won't be posting election "results" here. I will be posting a last second poll and the trends contained within.
At 10 EST, 7 PST I will be posting the full show including all of the results we have so far and I will start naming results.
I think this ban is disgusting and I the Supreme court should be ashamed of it's total misinterpretation of the Charter.
Non withstanding, it is presently law. As such, I won't be posting election "results" here. I will be posting a last second poll and the trends contained within.
At 10 EST, 7 PST I will be posting the full show including all of the results we have so far and I will start naming results.
I think this ban is disgusting and I the Supreme court should be ashamed of it's total misinterpretation of the Charter.
posted by Andrew at
8:50 PM
2 Comments:
I thought this law was more about being unable to spend more than $3,000 (?) in partisan "advertising" than in expressing your opinion gratis. Whatever it is, I'm totally with you, there should be no gag law.
By
talk talk talk / Shireen, at 10:07 AM
Well, I was dealing with section 329 - publishing of election results but I guess that really doesn't matter now.
By
Andrew, at 4:54 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home